This is my comment at Russia Insider, but is a more detailed explanation of what I posted here last night:
Some people look at the events of the day as isolated incidents; but I
regard them as part of a agenda. This court ruling is serious not only
as both an indicator and promoter of societal decay; but as the opening
of a gate. Obviously, it's happening in a degenerate society, it's
tautological in that way, but for the sake of conversation, suppose it
happened in a different society, one more libertarian. It might be just
another incident. But in a society where people let their emotions rule
their minds, rather than the opposite, it's dangerous. Look at the
recent Confederate Battle Flag ruckus.People here panic and act hastily
to be in compliance with the agenda.
Christians will be labeled
haters, -exactly- like Klan members. The emotions first majority will
expedite laws to punish the haters. A lot of people are using the word
persecution, which it will be; but I use the term nullify. Why? Friday I
had what -might- be a breakthrough in my understanding of current world
events. For years it's been a mystery to me how the progressive
societal engineers promote Isl_am along with their fi_lth. Now I might
understand...the immoral part of the agenda is to first remove
Christianity. Years ago, I heard that one of the consequences of war is
the eventual merging of the two societies. If that sounds like a fringe
and limited consequence, then consider how much we are constantly
exposed to information about Isl_am. Consider how often the names of
Iraqi cities are on the news. Consider how much more people know about
that religion than others, and how much more they know about it than
they did 20 years ago. It's the Sunnis vs the Shiites, the Fatwas, the
Immams, the holy days, all that.
I've learned a little bit about
economics, you know, the Keynesian theory vs the Austrian theory, etc. I
know this economy is way WAY past its shelf life. But now I think there
might be a time line: nullify Christian influence, then let the economy
crash. Can't have it happen first. Too messy and difficult to carry out
the action against Christianity. Then, a leader will come on the scene
who says "We can fix your economy, but it must be done according to our
religion and laws." "All those who wish to be part of the new economy
must accept our religion, and a ..."
Of course, that's pretty
dreary; and when I see things like the possible break up of the EU, or
talk of a Texas secession, I get a glimmer of sunshine in my soul,
hoping that all the above is miscalculation. But as I said before, the
events of the day aren't isolated.
